Relative Range

Updated daily · as of Sep 18, 2026

AAXJ

iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF

#1 of 6 in Broad Regions by own-history percentile (high → low)

Near lows (30.3%)

Relative to SPY

Relative price history

AAXJ ÷ SPY, 10-year range, as of Sep 18, 2026

Position in 10-year rangeNear lows (30.3%)ranked vs 2,513 trading days
12m vs S&P 500+14.9%Change in relative price over ~12 months
Category rank#1of 6 in Broad Regions
~1 week change+13.3 ptsvs Aug 31, 2026 reading (17%)
~1 month change+14.7 ptsvs Jul 31, 2026 reading (15.6%)
Trailing PE15.1xas of Sep 18, 2026
Current ratio0.1526
AUM$4.0BFund assets under management
Avg volume667KApprox. 3-month daily shares

How the reading moved

These changes re-score an older AAXJ÷SPY ratio against today's 10-year window, so they show whether the relative price has drifted toward the highs or lows of its own history — not a peer ranking and not a return forecast.

  • About one week: +13.3 pts (from 17% on Aug 31, 2026 to 30.3% now)
  • About one month: +14.7 pts (from 15.6% on Jul 31, 2026 to 30.3% now)

Broad Regions

Where this sits among peers

Broad Regions · AAXJ highlighted · same axes as the category chart on the home page

Top holdings

2330.TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd16.8%
005930.KQSamsung Electronics Co Ltd8.0%
000660.KQSK hynix Inc6.1%
0700.HKTencent Holdings Ltd3.2%
9988.HKAlibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares2.2%
2454.TWMediaTek Inc1.6%
D05.SIDBS Group Holdings Ltd1.1%
2308.TWDelta Electronics Inc1.0%
005935Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Participating Preferred1.0%
00939China Construction Bank Corp Class H0.9%

Holdings snapshot as of Jul 17, 2026.

What moves this

AAXJ overlaps heavily with the broader emerging-markets basket — China, Taiwan, and India together make up most of its weight — so its relative-price history tends to move in close step with VWO rather than telling a meaningfully different regional story.

FAQ

How is this different from the emerging-markets page?

It excludes Japan (a developed market) but otherwise overlaps substantially with the emerging-markets basket, so the two often move together.

Why exclude Japan specifically?

Japan is classified as a developed market, so an 'Asia ex-Japan' fund is really an emerging/developing-Asia basket rather than an all-Asia one.

Is there value in tracking this separately from broader EM?

It's useful when you want Asia-specific exposure without Latin America or EMEA components that are also part of the broader EM basket.

Broad Regions

Related in this category