Relative Range

Updated daily · as of Jul 17, 2026

EWY

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF

#2 of 10 in Emerging Markets by own-history percentile (high → low)

Near highs (71%)

Relative to SPY

Relative price history

EWY ÷ SPY, 10-year range, as of Jul 17, 2026

Position in 10-year rangeNear highs (71%)ranked vs 2,513 trading days
12m vs S&P 500+90.4%Change in relative price over ~12 months
Category rank#2of 10 in Emerging Markets
~1 week change+12.6 ptsvs Jun 30, 2026 reading (58.4%)
~1 month change+10.7 ptsvs May 29, 2026 reading (60.3%)
Trailing PE16.1xas of Jul 17, 2026
Current ratio0.2187
AUM$24.5BFund assets under management
Avg volume20.3MApprox. 3-month daily shares

How the reading moved

These changes re-score an older EWY÷SPY ratio against today's 10-year window, so they show whether the relative price has drifted toward the highs or lows of its own history — not a peer ranking and not a return forecast.

  • About one week: +12.6 pts (from 58.4% on Jun 30, 2026 to 71% now)
  • About one month: +10.7 pts (from 60.3% on May 29, 2026 to 71% now)

Emerging Markets

Where this sits among peers

Emerging Markets · EWY highlighted · same axes as the category chart on the home page

Top holdings

000660.KSSK Hynix Inc27.2%
005930.KSSamsung Electronics Co Ltd23.2%
402340.KSSK Square4.3%
009150.KSSamsung Electro-Mechanics Co Ltd3.6%
005380.KSHyundai Motor Co1.7%
105560.KSKB Financial Group Inc1.6%
028260.KSSamsung C&T Corp1.2%
055550.KSShinhan Financial Group Co Ltd1.2%
034020.KSDoosan Enerbility Co Ltd1.1%
032830.KSSamsung Life Insurance Co Ltd1.1%

Holdings snapshot as of Jul 17, 2026.

What moves this

EWY is dominated by memory-chip manufacturers, so its relative price swings track the global semiconductor cycle closely, layered on top of a persistent 'Korea discount' that market participants generally attribute to complex cross-shareholding structures among the large family-controlled conglomerates (chaebols) that dominate the index.

FAQ

What is the 'Korea discount' this page's structural note refers to?

It's a long-observed tendency for Korean equities to trade at lower valuations than fundamentals alone would suggest, generally attributed to complex ownership structures and governance practices within the large conglomerates that dominate the index.

Why does the memory-chip cycle matter so much here?

A small number of large semiconductor manufacturers make up a substantial share of the index, so global memory-chip pricing and demand cycles drive large swings in this fund's relative price.

Are there ongoing efforts to address the Korea discount?

Korean regulators and exchanges have pursued governance-reform initiatives aimed at this issue in recent years, though how much they've structurally closed the gap is a separate question from what this page's percentile shows.

Emerging Markets

Related in this category