Relative Range

Updated daily · as of Jul 17, 2026

XLK

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

#1 of 11 in US Sectors by own-history percentile (high → low)

Near highs (98.1%)

Relative to SPY

Relative price history

XLK ÷ SPY, 10-year range, as of Jul 17, 2026

Position in 10-year rangeNear highs (98.1%)ranked vs 2,513 trading days
12m vs S&P 500+14.6%Change in relative price over ~12 months
Category rank#1of 11 in US Sectors
~1 week change-1.9 ptsvs Jun 30, 2026 reading (100%)
~1 month change-1.6 ptsvs May 29, 2026 reading (99.7%)
Trailing PE32.8xas of Jul 17, 2026
Current ratio0.2362
AUM$123.9BFund assets under management
Avg volume12.4MApprox. 3-month daily shares

How the reading moved

These changes re-score an older XLK÷SPY ratio against today's 10-year window, so they show whether the relative price has drifted toward the highs or lows of its own history — not a peer ranking and not a return forecast.

  • About one week: -1.9 pts (from 100% on Jun 30, 2026 to 98.1% now)
  • About one month: -1.6 pts (from 99.7% on May 29, 2026 to 98.1% now)

US Sectors

Where this sits among peers

US Sectors · XLK highlighted · same axes as the category chart on the home page

Top holdings

NVDANVIDIA Corp12.6%
AAPLApple Inc11.1%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.2%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc4.7%
MUMicron Technology Inc4.7%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.7%
INTCIntel Corp4.2%
AMATApplied Materials Inc3.7%
LRCXLam Research Corp3.5%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc3.0%

Holdings snapshot as of Jul 17, 2026.

What moves this

XLK's weight is concentrated in a handful of mega-cap platform and semiconductor companies, so its relative price tends to move in large steps around shifts in the market's view of AI and cloud spending, rather than drifting gradually the way a more diversified sector does.

FAQ

Why does the technology sector's relative price move in such large jumps?

A small number of companies make up a large share of the index, so a re-rating of any one of them shows up directly in the sector-wide ratio — this sector is less diversified than its size suggests.

Does a high percentile here mean the sector is overpriced?

It means the price relative to the S&P 500 is high compared to this sector's own past 10 years — it says nothing about whether current earnings growth justifies that level.

Why compare technology to the S&P 500 instead of to another sector?

Comparing PE levels across sectors with different growth and capital structures produces misleading conclusions; comparing a sector only to its own history avoids that problem entirely.

US Sectors

Related in this category